Zachary v. . Holden

47 N.C. 453
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided August 5, 1855·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Peaeson, J.

Allen v. Greenlee, 2 Dev. 370, is a direct authority in support of the decision made in the Court below.

The same principle is applied to a converse state of facts, Rodgers v. Pitman, 2 Jones 56. The two cases settle the rule to be, that where process is valid and sued out maliciously, the proper action is case; where the process is void, as for *454 want of jurisdiction, the proper action is trespass vi eb a/rmis or trover.

Pee CueiaM. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zachary v. . Holden, 47 N.C. 453 (N.C. 1855).

47 N.C. 453 (Zachary v. . Holden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moser v. Fulk
74 S.E.2d 729 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Rhodes v. . Collins
150 S.E. 492 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1929)