Zachary U. Jackson v. Jacqueline Edwards

CourtCourt of Chancery of Delaware
DecidedJuly 24, 2024
DocketC.A. No. 2024-0227-LM
StatusPublished

This text of Zachary U. Jackson v. Jacqueline Edwards (Zachary U. Jackson v. Jacqueline Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zachary U. Jackson v. Jacqueline Edwards, (Del. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ZACHARY U. JACKSON and ) MOZELLE L. WILLIAMS, ) ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2024-0227-LM ) JACQUELINE EDWARDS, ) ) Respondent. )

ORDER

WHEREAS1:

A. On March 8, 2024, Petitioners Zachary U. Jackson and Mozelle L.

Williams (the “Petitioners”) filed a verified complaint against Respondent

Jacqueline Edwards (the “Respondent”) for undue influence over Louise Jones’ (the

“Decedent”) will (the “Will”).2

B. Decedent passed away testate on January 1, 2022.3

1 Citations to the record are in the form of Docket Item (“D. I.”) and identified by their entry number. Citations to the docket in the related Register of Wills matter, 180468 AF, will include the parenthetical (ROW) before the “D. I.” entry number. 2 D. I. 1. 3 ROW D. I. 1. C. Decedent executed a valid will on March 26, 2012, which was

notarized, signed by two witnesses, and nominated the Respondent as the executrix

of the Will. 4

D. The Will was admitted to probate on March 24, 2022, and Letters

Testamentary were issued to the Respondent.5

E. The Will devised the Decedent’s real property at 622 North Van Buren

Street, Wilmington, DE 19805 (the “Property”) and all its contents to Respondent in

fee simple absolute.6

F. The Inventory was due to the Register of Wills on or before June 24,

2022. 7

G. Decedent filed a late initial inventory on August 28, 2023, which valued

the property at $168,800 at the time of Decedent’s passing. 8 The inventory also

displayed $4,905.62 in one checking account.9

H. The Will devised $5,000 to each of the Petitioners and equally divided

all remaining bank accounts to the Decedent’s five grandchildren. 10

4 ROW D. I. 10. 5 ROW D. I. 13. 6 ROW D. I. 10. 7 ROW D. I. 9. 8 ROW D. I. 13. 9 ROW D. I. 13. 10 ROW D. I. 10. 2 I. The initial accounting was due to the Register of Wills on or before

March 24, 2023.11

J. Respondent filed a late first accounting on July 10, 2024, indicating a

zero-balance remaining in the estate. 12

K. Respondent filed this Motion to Dismiss under Court of Chancery Rule

12(b)(6) and 12 Del. C. § 1309 on March 28, 2024. 13

L. Petitioners responded to the Motion on April 3, 2024, and April 18,

2024. 14

M. Respondent filed a timely Reply on May 3, 2024.15
N. Five days later, Petitioners filed a sur-reply. 16
O. The standard under Rule 12(b)(6) is settled:

a. (i) all well-pleaded factual allegations are accepted as true; (ii)

even vague allegations are “well-pleaded” if they give the

opposing party notice of the claim; (iii) the Court must draw all

11 ROW D. I. 9. 12 ROW D. I. 19. 13 D. I. 11. 14 D. I. 12; D. I. 17; On April 22, 2024, the Court issued a minute order stipulating that the Petitioners’ April 18th letter will be treated as a Response to the Motion to Dismiss. D. I. 22. 15 D. I. 27. 16 D. I. 28. 3 reasonable inferences in favor of the non-moving party; and

[(iv)] dismissal is inappropriate unless the “plaintiff would not

be entitled to recover under any reasonably conceivable set of

circumstances susceptible of proof.”17

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, this 24th day of July 2024, as follows:

1. The Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss Petitioners’ claim for undue

influence over the Will is GRANTED. I find that, even when viewing

factual allegations most favorably to the Petitioners, this claim is time-

barred. Under 12 Del. C. § 1309, any challenge to the Will is due within

six months of its entry to probate. 18 This Court has repeatedly stated that

the unambiguous language of this statute bars any leniency in this statutory

period.19 Petitioners filed this complaint 531 days late. 20 All details in the

Petitioners’ complaint, even in viewing them in the light most favorable to

the Petitioners, are wholly related to alleged undue influence in creating

the Will, and therefore, are time-barred.21

17 Ct. Ch. R. 12b(6). 18 ROW D. I. 13; The last day for Petitioners to file this claim was September 24, 2022. 19 In re Chambers, 2019 WL 1568670, at *2 (Del. Ch. Mar. 26, 2019), adopted (Del. Ch. 2019) (citations omitted). 20 D. I. 1. 21 12 Del. C. § 1309. 4 2. This is my final report in this matter and any exceptions should be taken

within eleven days in accordance with Court of Chancery Rule 144.22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Loren Mitchell Magistrate in Chancery

22 See Ct. Ch. R. 144(d)(1) (“In actions that are not summary in nature or in which the Court has not ordered expedited proceedings, any party taking exception shall file a notice of exceptions within eleven days of the date of the report.”). 5

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1309
Delaware § 1309

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Zachary U. Jackson v. Jacqueline Edwards, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zachary-u-jackson-v-jacqueline-edwards-delch-2024.