Zachary T. Dixon, Attorney-In-Fact for Karin Dixon v. George Schilter and Shriners Hospital for Children
This text of Zachary T. Dixon, Attorney-In-Fact for Karin Dixon v. George Schilter and Shriners Hospital for Children (Zachary T. Dixon, Attorney-In-Fact for Karin Dixon v. George Schilter and Shriners Hospital for Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued November 13, 2025
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00143-CV ——————————— ZACHARY T. DIXON, AS ATTORNEY-IN-FACT FOR KARIN DIXON, Appellant V. GEORGE SCHILTER, INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF KATHRIN GVADIA, DECEASED AND SHINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN, Appellees
On Appeal from the Probate Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Case No. PR-0080172
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Zachary T. Dixon, as Attorney-in-Fact for Karin Dixon, filed a
notice of appeal from the trial court’s February 8, 2024 order granting the amended motion for summary judgment of appellees, George Schilter, Independent Executor
of the Estate of Kathrin Gvadia, Deceased and Shiners Hospitals for Children. On
the motion of appellant, this appeal was abated on August 6, 2024 because the parties
had “reached an agreement to settle this matter,” but needed additional time to
“allow the parties to finalize their settlement.”
On October 28, 2025, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal “pursuant
to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1).” See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1)
(permitting voluntary dismissal of appeal on motion of appellant).
No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c). Appellant’s motion included a certificate of
conference stating appellees are unopposed to the relief requested in the motion. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a).
Accordingly, the Court grants appellant’s motion, reinstates the appeal to the
Court’s active docket, and dismisses the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1),
43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Rivas-Molloy, Gunn, and Caughey.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Zachary T. Dixon, Attorney-In-Fact for Karin Dixon v. George Schilter and Shriners Hospital for Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zachary-t-dixon-attorney-in-fact-for-karin-dixon-v-george-schilter-and-texapp-2025.