Zachary Keith Hill v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 3, 2015·No. 01-14-00945-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-14-00945-CR Style: Zachary Keith Hill v. The State of Texas Date motion filed*: February 25, 2015 Type of motion: Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: N/A Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due date: N/A Date Requested: N/A (30 days from February 25, 2015)

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted in part  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Although the reporter’s record was filed on January 26, 2015, the clerk’s record has not yet been filed, but is due by March 12, 2015, because a timely motion for new trial was filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.2(b). Thus, appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file his brief is denied without prejudice to refiling after the clerk’s record is filed. Accordingly, appellant’s brief will be due 30 days after the date the clerk’s record is filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a)(1).

Judge’s signature: _/s/ Laura C. Higley  Acting individually

Date: March 3, 2015

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zachary Keith Hill v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Zachary Keith Hill v. State (Zachary Keith Hill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.