Zachary James McAlexander v. Vayman & Teitelbaum, P.C.
This text of Zachary James McAlexander v. Vayman & Teitelbaum, P.C. (Zachary James McAlexander v. Vayman & Teitelbaum, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ March 08, 2023
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A23A1121. ZACHARY JAMES MCALEXANDER v. VAYMAN & TEITELBAUM, P.C.
After the magistrate court entered a judgment in favor of Vayman & Teitelbaum, P. C., Zachary James McAlexander filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. “The only avenue of appeal available from [a] magistrate court judgment is provided by OCGA § 15-10-41 (b) (1), which allows for a de novo appeal to the state or superior court.” Handler v. Hulsey, 199 Ga. App. 751, 751 (406 SE2d 225) (1991). Accordingly, this Court has jurisdiction to consider matters addressed in a magistrate court’s order only if the state or superior court has first reviewed that order. See Baker v. G. T., Ltd., 194 Ga. App. 450, 451 (3) (391 SE2d 1) (1990). Given the lack of an appealable state or superior court order, we are unable to consider this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 03/08/2023 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Zachary James McAlexander v. Vayman & Teitelbaum, P.C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zachary-james-mcalexander-v-vayman-teitelbaum-pc-gactapp-2023.