Zachary Hawkins v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
This text of Zachary Hawkins v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (Zachary Hawkins v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
December 4, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 160442(79) Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra ZACHARY HAWKINS, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellant, Elizabeth T. Clement SC: 160442 Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v COA: 340338 Wayne CC: 15-014421-CZ NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. _______________________________________/
On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellant to extend the time for filing his reply is GRANTED. The reply will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before December 23, 2019.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. December 4, 2019
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Zachary Hawkins v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zachary-hawkins-v-norfolk-southern-railway-company-mich-2019.