Zachari Jerod Johnson v. the State of Texas
This text of Zachari Jerod Johnson v. the State of Texas (Zachari Jerod Johnson v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-25-00198-CR
ZACHARI JEROD JOHNSON, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 6th District Court Lamar County, Texas Trial Court No. 31618
Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Stevens MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pursuant to a plea agreement, Zachari Jerod Johnson pled guilty to theft of property
valued at $2,500.00 or more, but less than $30,000.00, and was sentenced to eight years’
confinement in prison. Despite the trial court’s certification that this was a plea-agreement case
and that Johnson had no right of appeal, he timely filed a notice of appeal. Because we find that
we are without jurisdiction, we will dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
The Texas Legislature has granted a very limited right of appeal in plea-bargain cases.
Rule 25.2(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure details that right as follows:
(2) . . . In a plea bargain case—that is, a case in which a defendant’s plea was guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant—a defendant may appeal only:
(A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial,
(B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal, or
(C) where the specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute.
TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). There is no indication in the record before this Court (1) that this
specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute, (2) that Johnson filed a motion that was ruled
on before trial, or (3) that Johnson obtained the trial court’s permission to appeal. To the
contrary, the trial court’s certification of Johnson’s right of appeal indicates that he has no right
of appeal. Pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, upon proper
certification by the trial court indicating there is no right of appeal, this Court will dismiss the
appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
2 On January 15, 2026, we informed Johnson of the apparent defect in our jurisdiction over
his appeal and afforded him an opportunity to respond and, if possible, cure such defect.
Johnson did not file a response to our January 15 correspondence.
Because Johnson has no right of appeal due to his plea agreement with the State and
because the trial court’s certification correctly indicates that he is without a right of appeal, we
dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Scott E. Stevens Chief Justice
Date Submitted: February 26, 2026 Date Decided: February 27, 2026
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Zachari Jerod Johnson v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zachari-jerod-johnson-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp6-2026.