Zaccardo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Zaccardo v. State

407 So. 2d 385, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22024

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 22, 1981

DocketNo. 80-1081

StatusPublished

This text of 407 So. 2d 385 (Zaccardo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zaccardo v. State, 407 So. 2d 385, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22024 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The conviction, adjudication and sentence rendered in this cause is reversed because of the refusal of the trial court to charge on the minimum penalties for trafficking in [386]*386cocaine, upon the authority of Tascano v. State, 393 So.2d 540 (Fla.1981). See also: Williams v. State, 399 So.2d 999 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Cunningham v. State, 404 So.2d 759 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

No merit is found as to the other point on appeal relating to the sufficiency of the evidence. Winchell v. State, 362 So.2d 992 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Frank v. State, 199 So.2d 117 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967); Spataro v. State, 179 So.2d 873 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965).

Therefore, the appellant and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI