Zabriskie v. Zoloto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zabriskie v. Zoloto

12 A.D.2d 752, 210 N.Y.S.2d 967, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13061

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 24, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 752 (Zabriskie v. Zoloto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zabriskie v. Zoloto, 12 A.D.2d 752, 210 N.Y.S.2d 967, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13061 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered on March 23, 1960, denying defendant’s motion, pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the amended complaint, as amended by the decision of the court, entered on April 5, 1960, granting defendant leave to set up the defense of the Statute of Frauds in his answer, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered on March 23, 1960, denying defendant’s motion, pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the amended complaint, as amended by the decision of the court, entered on April 5, 1960, granting defendant leave to set up the defense of the Statute of Frauds in his answer, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 752, 210 N.Y.S.2d 967, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13061, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zabriskie-v-zoloto-nyappdiv-1961.