Zabriskie v. Huyler
56 A. 1133, 64 N.J. Eq. 794, 19 Dickinson 794, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 221
Opinion
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.
For affirmance—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Dixon, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Adams, Yredenburgi-i, Yoori-iees, Yroom—12.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zabriskie v. Huyler, 56 A. 1133, 64 N.J. Eq. 794, 19 Dickinson 794, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 221 (N.J. 1902).
56 A. 1133 (Zabriskie v. Huyler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Estate of Hays
320 A.2d 234 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1974)
In Re Estate of Cook
206 A.2d 865 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1965)
De Benedictis v. De Benedictis
91 A.2d 368 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
Lawes v. Lynch
72 A.2d 414 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Halsey
40 A.2d 645 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1945)
Barrett v. Barrett
34 A.2d 579 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1943)
Redmond v. N.J. Historical Society
18 A.2d 275 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1941)
Trust Co. of N.J. v. Lange
195 A. 859 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1938)
Schoen v. Siegmund
183 A. 293 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)
Sadler v. Bergstrom
168 A. 50 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1933)
Kutschinski v. Bourginynon
139 A. 596 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1927)