Zabriskie v. Edwards

102 A. 1055, 90 N.J.L. 731, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 430
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 18, 1917
StatusPublished

This text of 102 A. 1055 (Zabriskie v. Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zabriskie v. Edwards, 102 A. 1055, 90 N.J.L. 731, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 430 (N.J. 1917).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

' The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam of this court in Maxwell et al., Executors, &c., v. Edwards, Comptroller, &c., et al., No. 108 of the present term of this court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, White, Heppeniteimeb, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 A. 1055, 90 N.J.L. 731, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zabriskie-v-edwards-nj-1917.