Zabriskie v. Edwards

102 A. 1055, 90 N.J.L. 731, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 430
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 18, 1917·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

' The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam of this court in Maxwell et al., Executors, &c., v. Edwards, Comptroller, &c., et al., No. 108 of the present term of this court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, White, Heppeniteimeb, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zabriskie v. Edwards, 102 A. 1055, 90 N.J.L. 731, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 430 (N.J. 1917).

102 A. 1055 (Zabriskie v. Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.