Zaborowski v. Kelly

93 A.D.3d 436, 938 N.Y.S.2d 895

This text of 93 A.D.3d 436 (Zaborowski v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zaborowski v. Kelly, 93 A.D.3d 436, 938 N.Y.S.2d 895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stallman, J.), entered May 17, 2010, denying the petition to annul respondents’ denial of accidental disability retirement benefits, and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The determination was not arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion or contrary to law. Credible evidence, including petitioner’s medical records, supports the Medical Board’s finding that petitioner’s ventricular tachycardia was not caused by hypertension or any other stress-related condition, and rebuts the statutory presumption that petitioner’s disabling heart condition is job-related (see General Municipal Law § 207-k; see Matter of McNamara v Kelly, 32 AD3d 747 [2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 810 [2007]). The Board of Trustees was entitled to rely on the Medical Board’s findings (see Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys., 88 NY2d 756, 760 [1996]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Acosta, Freedman and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Borenstein v. New York City Employees' Retirement System
673 N.E.2d 899 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 A.D.3d 436, 938 N.Y.S.2d 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zaborowski-v-kelly-nyappdiv-2012.