Z. Spada v. Catalde
This text of Z. Spada v. Catalde (Z. Spada v. Catalde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
ZACHARY SPADA, : No. 47 WM 2014 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : ROBERT J. CATALDE, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 21st day of August, 2014, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See
Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (hybrid representation not permitted).
The Prothonotary is directed to forward the filings to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Z. Spada v. Catalde, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/z-spada-v-catalde-pa-2014.