Z Produx, Inc. v. Make-Up Art Cosmetics, Inc.
This text of Z Produx, Inc. v. Make-Up Art Cosmetics, Inc. (Z Produx, Inc. v. Make-Up Art Cosmetics, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
Z PRODUX, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MAKE-UP ART COSMETICS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ______________________
2014-1143 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 2:13-cv-00734-DDP- RZ, Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
ROBERT D. KATZ, Katz PLLC, of Dallas, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
THOMAS C. MAHLUM, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, L.L.P., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for defendant- appellee. With him on the brief were JAN M. CONLIN, LARINA A. ALTON, and DAVID MARTINEZ. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
August 13, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Z Produx, Inc. v. Make-Up Art Cosmetics, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/z-produx-inc-v-make-up-art-cosmetics-inc-cafc-2014.