Z. K. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Z. K. v. State

871 So. 2d 1038, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6264, 2004 WL 950275

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 5, 2004·No. No. 4D03-4777·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Z.K., a child, was found guilty of battery on a law enforcement officer and resisting police officer without violence and placed on probation. The public defender’s office filed a brief and motion to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We agree there are no arguable issues on appeal and affirm.

However, one issue must be addressed on remand. See Bell v. State, 798 So.2d 796, 796-97 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). The amended delinquency disposition order incorrectly reads that the appellant pled “nolo contenedere [sic]”, but should read the appellant went to an adjudicatory hearing. Additionally, the amended order fails to include community service credits for employment and incorrectly gives credits for earning a “C” at school. The order should adhere to the oral pronouncement made by the trial court at the conclusion of the adjudicatory hearing. These errors appear to be merely scrivener’s errors that require correction, but not reversal. Id. at 797.

STONE, POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Z.K., a child, was found guilty of battery on a law enforcement officer and resisting police officer without violence and placed on probation. The public defender’s office filed a brief and motion to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We agree there are no arguable issues on appeal and affirm.

However, one issue must be addressed on remand. See Bell v. State, 798 So.2d 796, 796-97 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). The amended delinquency disposition order incorrectly reads that the appellant pled “nolo contenedere [sic]”, but should read the appellant went to an adjudicatory hearing. Additionally, the amended order fails to include community service credits for employment and incorrectly gives credits for earning a “C” at school. The order should adhere to the oral pronouncement made by the trial court at the conclusion of the adjudicatory hearing. These errors appear to be merely scrivener’s errors that require correction, but not reversal. Id. at 797.

STONE, POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Z. K. v. State, 871 So. 2d 1038, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6264, 2004 WL 950275 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

871 So. 2d 1038 (Z. K. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related