Home/Supreme Court/Z. & F. Assets Realization Corp. v. Hull

Z. & F. Assets Realization Corp. v. Hull

311 U.S. 632, 61 S. Ct. 51
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Z. & F. Assets Realization Corp. v. Hull. Read the opinion of the Court — 311 U.S. 470 →
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 14, 1940·No. No. 381; No. 382·Published

Opinion

Petitions for writs ‘ of cer-[633]*633tiorari to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia granted.

Messrs. Frank Roberson, John F. Condon, Jr., John, Bassett Moore, and Joseph M. Proskauer for petitioner in No. 381. Mr. Fred K. Nielsen for petitioner in No.. 382. Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attorney General Shea, and Messrs. Melvin H. Siegel and Francis J. McNamara for the Secretary of State et al., and Mr. William D. Mitchell for the Lehigh Valley Railroad Co.; respondents. Mr. Justice Roberts took no part in the consideration and decision of 'these'applications.

Reported below: 114 P. 2d 464.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Z. & F. Assets Realization Corp. v. Hull, 311 U.S. 632, 61 S. Ct. 51 (1940).

311 U.S. 632 (Z. & F. Assets Realization Corp. v. Hull) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.