Y&Y Eastern Acupuncture, P.C. v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Y&Y Eastern Acupuncture, P.C. v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

80 A.D.3d 605, 914 N.Y.S.2d 637

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 11, 2011

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 80 A.D.3d 605 (Y&Y Eastern Acupuncture, P.C. v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Y&Y Eastern Acupuncture, P.C. v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp., 80 A.D.3d 605, 914 N.Y.S.2d 637 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action to recover no-fault medical payments pursuant to Insurance Law article 52, the defendant appeals, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court for the Second, Eleventh, and Thirteen Judicial Districts, dated October 31, 2008, which affirmed an order of the Civil Court, Kings County (King, J.), entered September 11, 2007, denying that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order dated October 31, 2008, is affirmed, with costs.

For the reasons set forth in the opinion and order in a companion appeal (see Englington Med., P.C. v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp., 81 AD3d 223 [2011] [decided herewith]), the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court for the Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts properly affirmed the order of the Civil Court, Kings County, denying that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Covello, J.P., Angiolillo, Leventhal and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover no-fault medical payments pursuant to Insurance Law article 52, the defendant appeals, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court for the Second, Eleventh, and Thirteen Judicial Districts, dated October 31, 2008, which affirmed an order of the Civil Court, Kings County (King, J.), entered September 11, 2007, denying that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order dated October 31, 2008, is affirmed, with costs.

For the reasons set forth in the opinion and order in a companion appeal (see Englington Med., P.C. v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp., 81 AD3d 223 [2011] [decided herewith]), the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court for the Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts properly affirmed the order of the Civil Court, Kings County, denying that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Covello, J.P., Angiolillo, Leventhal and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 A.D.3d 605, 914 N.Y.S.2d 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yy-eastern-acupuncture-pc-v-motor-vehicle-accident-indemnification-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack