Yvonne Young v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Ivan Felin, Chairman

43 F.3d 1470, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39983, 1994 WL 621836
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 10, 1994
Docket94-1493
StatusUnpublished

This text of 43 F.3d 1470 (Yvonne Young v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Ivan Felin, Chairman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yvonne Young v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Ivan Felin, Chairman, 43 F.3d 1470, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39983, 1994 WL 621836 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

43 F.3d 1470

4 A.D. Cases 512

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Yvonne YOUNG, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION; Ivan Felin, Chairman,
Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-1493.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 25, 1994
Decided Nov. 10, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-93-1809-JFM)

Yvonne Young, appellant pro se.

David Ira Salem, Asst. U.S. Atty., Baltimore, Md., for appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment for Defendants in her employment discrimination case. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Young v. NRC, No. CA-93-1809-JFM (Mar. 31, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Additionally, we deny Appellant's motions for appointment of counsel, for oral argument, and to transfer the case to the District of Columbia Circuit. Her motion to expedite the appeal is moot and is denied for that reason

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Young v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
871 F. Supp. 820 (D. Maryland, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 F.3d 1470, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39983, 1994 WL 621836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yvonne-young-v-nuclear-regulatory-commission-ivan-felin-chairman-ca4-1994.