Yvonne Hickman v. Rob Carpenter D/B/A Lightning Automotive

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 17, 2012·No. A12A1797·Published

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,_________________ May 17, 2012

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A12A1797. YVONNE HICKMAN v. ROB CARPENTER.

Yvonne Hickman sued Rob Carpenter in magistrate court. The magistrate court entered judgment in favor of Carpenter, and Hickman appealed to superior court. The superior court likewise found in favor of Carpenter. Hickman then filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. “[A]ppeals from decisions of the superior courts reviewing decisions of lower courts by certiorari or de novo proceedings shall be by application for discretionary appeal.” Bullock v. Sand, 260 Ga. App. 874, 875 (581 SE2d 333) (2003); see also OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995). Because Hickman did not follow the proper procedure for requesting discretionary review in this case, it is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 05/17/2012 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,_________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yvonne Hickman v. Rob Carpenter D/B/A Lightning Automotive, (Ga. Ct. App. 2012).

Yvonne Hickman v. Rob Carpenter D/B/A Lightning Automotive (Yvonne Hickman v. Rob Carpenter D/B/A Lightning Automotive) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

English v. Delbridge
454 S.E.2d 175 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1995)
Bullock v. Sand
581 S.E.2d 333 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2003)