Yvonne Carol Lindsey v. State
This text of Yvonne Carol Lindsey v. State (Yvonne Carol Lindsey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-15-00007-CR
YVONNE CAROL LINDSEY, Appellant v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
From the 278th District Court Walker County, Texas Trial Court No. 25,743
ABATEMENT ORDER
On January 9, 2015, appellant, Yvonne Carol Lindsey, filed her notice of appeal in
this matter. Attached to her notice of appeal was a copy of the trial court’s certification
of her right of appeal. Upon reviewing the certification, this Court noticed that appellant
had not signed the certification of her right of appeal. Accordingly, on January 15, 2015,
we informed appellant, the trial court, the Walker County District Clerk’s Office, and the Walker County District Attorney’s Office that the trial court’s certification of appellant’s
right of appeal is defective and requested that the defect be cured within thirty days.
Subsequently, on April 8, 2015, the Clerk’s Record was filed. Once again, the trial
court’s certification of appellant’s right of appeal was unsigned by appellant.1 Thereafter,
we received a letter from Kimberly Bartee, the Chief Deputy District Clerk for Walker
County. In her letter, Bartee indicated that appellant’s attorney “has tried numerous
times to contact Ms. Lindsey and left numerous voice messages of the urgent need for her
to sign the Trial Court Certification” and that the Walker County District Clerk’s Office
“has had no contact with [Appellant].” As such, “the Clerk’s Record was sent to the Court
with the Trial Court Certification incomplete due to the lack of signature.” To date,
appellant has not signed the trial court’s certification of her right of appeal.
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) provides that:
The certification shall include a notice that the defendant has been informed of [her] rights concerning an appeal, as well as any right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. This notification shall be signed by the defendant, with a copy given to [her]. The certification should be part of the record when notice is filed, but may be added by timely amendment or supplementation under this rule or Rule 34.5(c)(1) or Rule 37.1 or by order of the appellate court under Rule 34.5(c)(2).
1 The record reflects that this case involves the revocation of appellant’s community supervision. When the trial court first imposed community supervision, appellant signed the certification of her right of appeal. However, when appellant’s community supervision was revoked, the certification was unsigned. Nevertheless, the certification in appellant’s community-supervision-revocation case indicates that she has the right to appeal.
Lindsey v. State Page 2 TEX. R. APP P. 25.2(d) (emphasis added). Therefore, because the certification on file has
not been signed by appellant, it is defective. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614 (Tex.
Crim. App. 2005); see also Anthony v. State, No. 07-13-00089-CR, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS
13064, at *2 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Oct. 18, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for
publication).
In Cortez v. State, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals outlined the procedure for
obtaining a proper certification under the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See 420
S.W.3d 803, 806-07 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). The first step, as was undertaken in this
matter, is to notify the trial judge and the trial court clerk of the defective certification and
to direct supplementation of the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(2); see also Cortez, 420
S.W.3d at 806. Because we have concluded that appellant’s certification is defective, and
because we have not yet received a compliant certification in this matter, we must move
to the second step in Cortez—to direct the trial court to obtain a properly executed
certification that does comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d). See TEX.
R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see also Cortez, 420 S.W.3d at 806.
Consequently, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for
further proceedings. On remand, the trial court may utilize whatever means its finds
necessary to secure and file with this Court a certificate of right of appeal that complies
with Rule 25.2(d), including the requirement that it be signed by appellant. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 25.2(d). Once properly completed and executed, the certification shall be included
Lindsey v. State Page 3 in a Supplemental Clerk’s Record. See id. at R. 34.5(a)(12). The trial court shall cause the
Supplemental Clerk’s Record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court by July 3, 2015.
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal abated Order issued and filed May 28, 2015 Do not publish [CR25]
Lindsey v. State Page 4
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Yvonne Carol Lindsey v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yvonne-carol-lindsey-v-state-texapp-2015.