Yvette Tisdale v. Emily Bullard Cross, Julie Bullard, Kerry Bullard, and DBA Rightway Services TX, LLC.
This text of Yvette Tisdale v. Emily Bullard Cross, Julie Bullard, Kerry Bullard, and DBA Rightway Services TX, LLC. (Yvette Tisdale v. Emily Bullard Cross, Julie Bullard, Kerry Bullard, and DBA Rightway Services TX, LLC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-26-00245-CV __________________
YVETTE TISDALE, Appellant
V.
EMILY BULLARD CROSS, JULIE BULLARD, KERRY BULLARD, AND DBA RIGHTWAY SERVICES TX, LLC., Appellees
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 457th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 25-10-16125 __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Yvette Tisdale filed a notice of appeal from an Order on Defendants’ No-
Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment, signed June 3, 2026. The Order states,
“This is an Interlocutory Order as Defendants’ counterclaims remain pending.”
Through a notice issued by the appellate clerk, we notified the parties that it appears
the order being appealed is neither a final judgment nor an appealable interlocutory
1 order. Appellant filed a response through which she conceded that the trial court has
not yet signed a final judgment in the case.
Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments or interlocutory
orders that are otherwise appealable by statute. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39
S.W.3d 191, 195, 200 (Tex. 2001); see Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 51.012
(appeal from final judgment), 51.014 (authorizes accelerated appeals from certain
interlocutory orders). A judgment or order is final if it disposes of every pending
claim and party. Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 205. Tisdale concedes the Order identified
in the Notice of Appeal is not appealable as a final judgment. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a); 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on July 15, 2026 Opinion Delivered July 16, 2026
Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Chambers, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Yvette Tisdale v. Emily Bullard Cross, Julie Bullard, Kerry Bullard, and DBA Rightway Services TX, LLC., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yvette-tisdale-v-emily-bullard-cross-julie-bullard-kerry-bullard-and-txctapp9-2026.