Yvette Tisdale v. Emily Bullard Cross, Julie Bullard, Kerry Bullard, and DBA Rightway Services TX, LLC.

CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
DecidedJuly 16, 2026
Docket09-26-00245-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Yvette Tisdale v. Emily Bullard Cross, Julie Bullard, Kerry Bullard, and DBA Rightway Services TX, LLC. (Yvette Tisdale v. Emily Bullard Cross, Julie Bullard, Kerry Bullard, and DBA Rightway Services TX, LLC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yvette Tisdale v. Emily Bullard Cross, Julie Bullard, Kerry Bullard, and DBA Rightway Services TX, LLC., (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-26-00245-CV __________________

YVETTE TISDALE, Appellant

V.

EMILY BULLARD CROSS, JULIE BULLARD, KERRY BULLARD, AND DBA RIGHTWAY SERVICES TX, LLC., Appellees

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 457th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 25-10-16125 __________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Yvette Tisdale filed a notice of appeal from an Order on Defendants’ No-

Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment, signed June 3, 2026. The Order states,

“This is an Interlocutory Order as Defendants’ counterclaims remain pending.”

Through a notice issued by the appellate clerk, we notified the parties that it appears

the order being appealed is neither a final judgment nor an appealable interlocutory

1 order. Appellant filed a response through which she conceded that the trial court has

not yet signed a final judgment in the case.

Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments or interlocutory

orders that are otherwise appealable by statute. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39

S.W.3d 191, 195, 200 (Tex. 2001); see Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 51.012

(appeal from final judgment), 51.014 (authorizes accelerated appeals from certain

interlocutory orders). A judgment or order is final if it disposes of every pending

claim and party. Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 205. Tisdale concedes the Order identified

in the Notice of Appeal is not appealable as a final judgment. Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a); 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on July 15, 2026 Opinion Delivered July 16, 2026

Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Chambers, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Yvette Tisdale v. Emily Bullard Cross, Julie Bullard, Kerry Bullard, and DBA Rightway Services TX, LLC., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yvette-tisdale-v-emily-bullard-cross-julie-bullard-kerry-bullard-and-txctapp9-2026.