YVETTE LYNN HERNANDEZ, etc. v. MARK A. ZUCKER
This text of YVETTE LYNN HERNANDEZ, etc. v. MARK A. ZUCKER (YVETTE LYNN HERNANDEZ, etc. v. MARK A. ZUCKER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed August 11, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D20-1397 Lower Tribunal No. 18-21195 ________________
Yvette Lynn Hernandez, etc., Appellant,
vs.
Mark A. Zucker, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Maria Elena Verde, Judge.
Lorenzen Law P.A., and Dirk Lorenzen, for appellant.
Marro Law P.A., and Meaghan K. Marro (Plantation), for appellee.
Before EMAS, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197, 1203 (Fla.
1980) (noting: “In reviewing a true discretionary act, the appellate court must
fully recognize the superior vantage point of the trial judge and should apply
the ‘reasonableness’ test to determine whether the trial judge abused [its]
discretion. If reasonable [people] could differ as to the propriety of the action
taken by the trial court, then the action is not unreasonable and there can be
no finding of an abuse of discretion. The discretionary ruling of the trial judge
should be disturbed only when [the] decision fails to satisfy this test of
reasonableness.”); Castillo v. Castillo, 59 So. 3d 221 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011);
Pierre v. Pierre, 185 So. 3d 1264 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
YVETTE LYNN HERNANDEZ, etc. v. MARK A. ZUCKER, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yvette-lynn-hernandez-etc-v-mark-a-zucker-fladistctapp-2021.