Yvette J. Madsen v. Winfred Overholser, Superintendent of Saint Elizabeths Hospital

D.C. Circuit

Yvette J. Madsen v. Winfred Overholser, Superintendent of Saint Elizabeths Hospital

251 F.2d 387

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMarch 31, 1958

Docket14130

StatusPublished

This text of 251 F.2d 387 (Yvette J. Madsen v. Winfred Overholser, Superintendent of Saint Elizabeths Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yvette J. Madsen v. Winfred Overholser, Superintendent of Saint Elizabeths Hospital, 251 F.2d 387 (D.C. Cir. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

*388 PER CURIAM.

Appellant, then an Army wife in Germany, was convicted of murdering her husband. She has served only part of her sentence and is now a mental patient in St. Elizabeths Hospital. She contends her conviction and sentence were invalid and asks release in habeas corpus. In a previous habeas corpus case, Madsen v. Kinsella, 343 U.S. 341, 72 S.Ct. 699, 96 L.Ed. 988, the Supreme Court sustained her conviction and sentence. She asks us to treat that decision as overruled by Reid v. Covert (Kinsella v. Krueger), 354 U.S. 1, 77 S.Ct. 1222, 1 L.Ed.2d 1148. But we deem ourselves bound by the Supreme Court’s decision in the Madsen case itself.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*388 PER CURIAM.

Appellant, then an Army wife in Germany, was convicted of murdering her husband. She has served only part of her sentence and is now a mental patient in St. Elizabeths Hospital. She contends her conviction and sentence were invalid and asks release in habeas corpus. In a previous habeas corpus case, Madsen v. Kinsella, 343 U.S. 341, 72 S.Ct. 699, 96 L.Ed. 988, the Supreme Court sustained her conviction and sentence. She asks us to treat that decision as overruled by Reid v. Covert (Kinsella v. Krueger), 354 U.S. 1, 77 S.Ct. 1222, 1 L.Ed.2d 1148. But we deem ourselves bound by the Supreme Court’s decision in the Madsen case itself.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 F.2d 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yvette-j-madsen-v-winfred-overholser-superintendent-of-saint-elizabeths-cadc-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack