Yutzy v. Fouraker

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Yutzy v. Fouraker

969 So. 2d 1135, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18113, 2007 WL 3355458

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 14, 2007·No. No. 2D06-3075·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Brannen Yutzy and Yutzy Tree Service, Inc. (defendants below) appeal the trial court’s order that granted Bradley Dean Fouraker (plaintiff below) a new trial. Fouraker cross-appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for a directed verdict on the issues of permanency and indivisible injury. We affirm without comment the order granting a new trial and the denial of the motion for directed verdict. For the benefit of the trial court and the parties on remand, we note that the grounds for the trial court’s decision to grant a new trial require a new trial on all issues.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, CASANUEVA, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Brannen Yutzy and Yutzy Tree Service, Inc. (defendants below) appeal the trial court’s order that granted Bradley Dean Fouraker (plaintiff below) a new trial. Fouraker cross-appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for a directed verdict on the issues of permanency and indivisible injury. We affirm without comment the order granting a new trial and the denial of the motion for directed verdict. For the benefit of the trial court and the parties on remand, we note that the grounds for the trial court’s decision to grant a new trial require a new trial on all issues.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, CASANUEVA, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Yutzy v. Fouraker, 969 So. 2d 1135, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18113, 2007 WL 3355458 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

969 So. 2d 1135 (Yutzy v. Fouraker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.