Yusuf v. Hilton Hotel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Yusuf v. Hilton Hotel

729 N.W.2d 576, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 173, 2007 WL 1018307

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMarch 29, 2007

DocketA06-2474

StatusPublished

This text of 729 N.W.2d 576 (Yusuf v. Hilton Hotel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yusuf v. Hilton Hotel, 729 N.W.2d 576, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 173, 2007 WL 1018307 (Mich. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed December 4, 2006, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that *577 “[sjummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Helen M. Meyer Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI