Yusten v. Yusten

Nebraska Supreme Court

Yusten v. Yusten

444 N.W.2d 681, 233 Neb. 256, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 362

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 25, 1989

DocketNo. 89-043

StatusPublished

This text of 444 N.W.2d 681 (Yusten v. Yusten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yusten v. Yusten, 444 N.W.2d 681, 233 Neb. 256, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 362 (Neb. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Cy R. Yusten appeals the award of alimony to his ex-wife, Connee L. Yusten.

As required in cases of this nature, we have reviewed the record de novo to determine whether the district court abused its discretion in the alimony award. Ray v. Ray, 222 Neb. 324, 383 N.W.2d 752 (1986).

Upon a de novo review of this case, we find no patent unfairness in the alimony award. Therefore, there was no abuse of discretion by the trial court, and its decree should be affirmed.

Each party shall pay his or her own costs and attorney fees in this court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI