Yusten v. Yusten
444 N.W.2d 681, 233 Neb. 256, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 362
Opinion
Cy R. Yusten appeals the award of alimony to his ex-wife, Connee L. Yusten.
As required in cases of this nature, we have reviewed the record de novo to determine whether the district court abused its discretion in the alimony award. Ray v. Ray, 222 Neb. 324, 383 N.W.2d 752 (1986).
Upon a de novo review of this case, we find no patent unfairness in the alimony award. Therefore, there was no abuse of discretion by the trial court, and its decree should be affirmed.
Each party shall pay his or her own costs and attorney fees in this court.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Yusten v. Yusten, 444 N.W.2d 681, 233 Neb. 256, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 362 (Neb. 1989).
444 N.W.2d 681 (Yusten v. Yusten) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ray v. Ray
383 N.W.2d 752 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)