Yusof A. Shabazz v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: June 9, 2005
• Docket: 02-04-00155-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH

 

NO. 2-04-155-CR

 
 

YUSOF A. SHABAZZ                                                              APPELLANT

 

V.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                                  STATE

 
 

------------

 

FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

   

MEMORANDUM OPINION¹

 

        In a single point on appeal, appellant contends that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the trial court’s deadly weapon finding.  Appellant pled guilty and signed a judicial confession stating that he had committed “each and every allegation [the indictment] contains,” which alleged that appellant used or exhibited a deadly weapon in committing the offense.  At the plea hearing, appellant answered “True” when asked whether he used or exhibited a deadly weapon.  We hold that this evidence is sufficient to support the deadly weapon finding.  See Keller v. State, 125 S.W.3d 600, 605 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003), pet. dism’d, improvidently granted, 146 S.W.3d 677 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004), cert. denied, 125 S. Ct. 1603 (2005); Hunt v. State, 967 S.W.2d 917, 919 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 1998, no pet.); Rankin v. State, No. 02-98-00382-CR, slip op. at 5 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Mar. 7, 2002, pet. ref’d) (op. on remand) (not designated for publication).  We overrule appellant’s sole point and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

                                                          PER CURIAM

 
 

PANEL F:   LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

 

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

 

DELIVERED: June 9, 2005

---

NOTES

1.  See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.