Yurteri v. Artukmac

28 A.D.3d 545, 812 N.Y.S.2d 365, 813 N.Y.S.2d 741
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 11, 2006·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

In a hybrid action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is the owner of 50% of the outstanding shares of the defendant Fast Enterprises, Ltd., and a proceeding pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 1104-a for the dissolution of Fast Enterprises, Ltd., the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pitts, J.), dated March 22, 2004, as denied that branch of his motion which was pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) to vacate a prior order of the same court dated August 19, 2002 granting the defendants’ unopposed motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated March 22, 2004 is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that order was superseded by an order of the same court dated July 26, 2004 made upon reargument (see Yurteri v Artukmac, 28 AD3d 545 [2006] [decided herewith]). Prudenti, P.J., Krausman, Mastro and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yurteri v. Artukmac, 28 A.D.3d 545, 812 N.Y.S.2d 365, 813 N.Y.S.2d 741 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

28 A.D.3d 545 (Yurteri v. Artukmac) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goody v. Lloyd
43 A.D.3d 390 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Forward Door of New York, Inc. v. Forlader
41 A.D.3d 535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Piton v. Cribb
38 A.D.3d 741 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Ortega v. Bisogno & Meyerson
38 A.D.3d 510 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Montefiore Medical Center v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
37 A.D.3d 673 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)