Yung v. Mount Vernon Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Yung v. Mount Vernon Hospital

9 A.D.2d 935, 194 N.Y.S.2d 961, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5401

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 28, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 9 A.D.2d 935 (Yung v. Mount Vernon Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yung v. Mount Vernon Hospital, 9 A.D.2d 935, 194 N.Y.S.2d 961, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5401 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, the appeals are from an order granting respondent’s motion to examine persons as witnesses (Civ. Prac. Act, § 288). Order reversed, without costs, and motion remitted to the Special Term for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Under the circumstances presented, the subject matter of the examinations of the witnesses Velma Richardson, Dr. J. Gr. Sharnoff and Dr. Milton Phillips, and of items 4 and 5 contained in the notice of motion as to witness Rose-Marie Bell Rhodes should not have been allowed, as said subject matter is irrelevant. Furthermore, the depositions should be taken before a Referee (Civ. Prac. Act, § 296-a), Nolan, P. J,, Beldock, Ughetta arid Klejpfeld, JJ., copcur; Murphy, J,, deceased.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, the appeals are from an order granting respondent’s motion to examine persons as witnesses (Civ. Prac. Act, § 288). Order reversed, without costs, and motion remitted to the Special Term for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Under the circumstances presented, the subject matter of the examinations of the witnesses Velma Richardson, Dr. J. Gr. Sharnoff and Dr. Milton Phillips, and of items 4 and 5 contained in the notice of motion as to witness Rose-Marie Bell Rhodes should not have been allowed, as said subject matter is irrelevant. Furthermore, the depositions should be taken before a Referee (Civ. Prac. Act, § 296-a), Nolan, P. J,, Beldock, Ughetta arid Klejpfeld, JJ., copcur; Murphy, J,, deceased.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A.D.2d 935, 194 N.Y.S.2d 961, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yung-v-mount-vernon-hospital-nyappdiv-1959.