Yung Brothers Real Estate Co. v. Limandri
This text of 92 A.D.3d 508 (Yung Brothers Real Estate Co. v. Limandri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The ALJ correctly found that, to demonstrate their right to maintain the nonconforming advertising sign on their premises, petitioners were required to show that there was an advertising sign on the premises at the time the ordinance prohibiting advertising signs took effect (see Matter of Syracuse Aggregate Corp. v Weise, 51 NY2d 278, 284 [1980]). The ALJ’s determination that petitioners failed to make this showing is supported by substantial evidence. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P, Saxe, Moskowitz, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 A.D.3d 508, 938 N.Y.2d 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yung-brothers-real-estate-co-v-limandri-nyappdiv-2012.