Yun-Shou Gao v. City of New York
This text of 29 A.D.3d 449 (Yun-Shou Gao v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stallman, J.), entered December 8, 2005, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of defendants’ liability under Labor Law § 240 (1), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The motion was made before any disclosure had been conducted and was properly denied in the circumstances presented (see CPLR 3212 [f]; McGlynn v Palace Co., 262 AD2d 116 [1999]). Our affirmance is without prejudice to plaintiffs’ renewal of the motion after completion of disclosure (see id.). Concur—Friedman, J.P., Sullivan, Williams, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 A.D.3d 449, 814 N.Y.S.2d 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yun-shou-gao-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2006.