Yula v. Sample Parking Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Yula v. Sample Parking Corp.

294 A.D.2d 236, 741 N.Y.S.2d 863, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5436

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 23, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 294 A.D.2d 236 (Yula v. Sample Parking Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yula v. Sample Parking Corp., 294 A.D.2d 236, 741 N.Y.S.2d 863, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5436 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton Tingling, J.), entered October 4, 2001, which denied defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant-appellant dismissing the complaint as against it.

Plaintiff Anthony Yula was injured on the premises of the parking garage owned and operated by defendant-appellant Sample Parking Corp. (Sample) when he was struck by the automobile operated by co-defendant Jakka Sairamesh. The co-defendant’s uncontradicted testimony establishes that the sole proximate cause of the accident was either his negligent operation of his vehicle or a malfunction of the vehicle’s braking mechanism. Accordingly, Sample is entitled to summary judgment (see, Stone v Williams, 64 NY2d 639, 642; Jeffries v State of New York, 160 AD2d 838, lv denied 76 NY2d 704). Concur— Williams, P.J., Tom, Saxe, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton Tingling, J.), entered October 4, 2001, which denied defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant-appellant dismissing the complaint as against it.

Plaintiff Anthony Yula was injured on the premises of the parking garage owned and operated by defendant-appellant Sample Parking Corp. (Sample) when he was struck by the automobile operated by co-defendant Jakka Sairamesh. The co-defendant’s uncontradicted testimony establishes that the sole proximate cause of the accident was either his negligent operation of his vehicle or a malfunction of the vehicle’s braking mechanism. Accordingly, Sample is entitled to summary judgment (see, Stone v Williams, 64 NY2d 639, 642; Jeffries v State of New York, 160 AD2d 838, lv denied 76 NY2d 704). Concur— Williams, P.J., Tom, Saxe, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

294 A.D.2d 236, 741 N.Y.S.2d 863, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yula-v-sample-parking-corp-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack