Yukon Lumber Co. v. Medven
This text of 74 F.2d 1022 (Yukon Lumber Co. v. Medven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this automobile collision damage case, the defendant-appellant asked for binding instructions in its favor on the twofold ground that there was no evidence of its negligence and that the plaintiff-appellee’s decedent was guilty of contributory negligence. The trial court refused such request and submitted both questions to the jury. It found in plaintiff’s favor.
The case depends on its own particular facts, and, as no principles or precedents are involved and we find no error on the part of the trial court, we limit ourselves to affirming the judgment below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 F.2d 1022, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yukon-lumber-co-v-medven-ca3-1934.