Yukon Lumber Co. v. Medven

74 F.2d 1022, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4031
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedDecember 12, 1934
DocketNo. 5522
StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.2d 1022 (Yukon Lumber Co. v. Medven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yukon Lumber Co. v. Medven, 74 F.2d 1022, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4031 (3d Cir. 1934).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this automobile collision damage case, the defendant-appellant asked for binding instructions in its favor on the twofold ground that there was no evidence of its negligence and that the plaintiff-appellee’s decedent was guilty of contributory negligence. The trial court refused such request and submitted both questions to the jury. It found in plaintiff’s favor.

The case depends on its own particular facts, and, as no principles or precedents are involved and we find no error on the part of the trial court, we limit ourselves to affirming the judgment below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 F.2d 1022, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yukon-lumber-co-v-medven-ca3-1934.