Yuille v. Bridgeport Hospital, No. Cv98 035 89 02 S (Feb. 7, 2002)

2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 1495, 31 Conn. L. Rptr. 339
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided February 7, 2002·No. No. CV98 035 89 02 S CT Page 1496·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION TO REARGUE OR FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOCKET ENTRY NO. 140)
The Motion to Reargue is DENIED.

Plaintiff has waived his right to reargue by filing an amended complaint. See P L Properties v. Schnip Develorment, 35 Conn. App. 46,49 (1994) and cases cited therein; see also, Henry v. Lisbell, fn. 2, Superior Court, judicial district of Fairfield, Docket No. 0346842 (August 2, 2001)

Melville, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yuille v. Bridgeport Hospital, No. Cv98 035 89 02 S (Feb. 7, 2002), 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 1495, 31 Conn. L. Rptr. 339 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002).

2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 1495 (Yuille v. Bridgeport Hospital, No. Cv98 035 89 02 S (Feb. 7, 2002)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

P & L Properties, Inc. v. Schnip Development Corp.
643 A.2d 1302 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1994)