Yuhua Han v. Gladyshev

2017 NY Slip Op 6217, 153 A.D.3d 762, 57 N.Y.S.3d 893
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 16, 2017
Docket2016-04735
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 6217 (Yuhua Han v. Gladyshev) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yuhua Han v. Gladyshev, 2017 NY Slip Op 6217, 153 A.D.3d 762, 57 N.Y.S.3d 893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), dated April 5, 2016, which denied their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability with leave to renew upon the completion of discovery.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff Yuhua Han (hereinafter the injured plaintiff) allegedly was walking across Ocean Avenue in Brooklyn when she was struck by the defendant’s vehicle. Thereafter, the injured plaintiff, and her husband suing derivatively, commenced this action against the defendant. Before anyone was deposed, the plaintiffs moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability. The Supreme Court denied the motion with leave to renew upon the completion of discovery. We affirm.

*763 Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the Supreme Court properly determined that, at this stage of the case, the plaintiffs’ motion was premature. No one has been deposed, and the defendant has not had an adequate opportunity to conduct discovery. Moreover, the injured plaintiff and the defendant submitted affidavits containing discrepancies pertaining to the circumstances of the subject accident (see Bond v DeMasco, 84 AD3d 1292, 1293 [2011]; Cardone v Poidamani, 73 AD3d 828 [2010]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability with leave to renew upon completion of discovery.

Eng, P.J., Leventhal, Sgroi and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cardone v. Poidamani
73 A.D.3d 828 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Bond v. DeMasco
84 A.D.3d 1292 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 6217, 153 A.D.3d 762, 57 N.Y.S.3d 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yuhua-han-v-gladyshev-nyappdiv-2017.