Yugler v. Myers

39 P.3d 186, 333 Or. 330, 2002 Ore. LEXIS 69
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 7, 2002
DocketSC S49042
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 39 P.3d 186 (Yugler v. Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yugler v. Myers, 39 P.3d 186, 333 Or. 330, 2002 Ore. LEXIS 69 (Or. 2002).

Opinion

*332 PER CURIAM

In this ballot title review proceeding, petitioner challenges various aspects of the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for a proposed initiative measure, which the Secretary of State has denominated as Initiative Petition 126 (2002). We review the Attorney General’s certified ballot title to determine whether it substantially complies with the requirements of ORS 250.035(2)(a) to (d). See ORS 250.085(5) (setting out standard of review).

We have considered petitioner’s arguments and determine that they are not well taken. Accordingly, we certify to the Secretary of State the following ballot title for the proposed measure:

AMENDS CONSTITUTION: PROHIBITS, UNDER SPECIFIED CIRCUMSTANCES, RECOVERING DAMAGES FROM PERSONS LAWFULLY MANUFACTURING, DISTRIBUTING, SELLING, ADVERTISING LAWFUL PRODUCTS
RESULT OF ‘YES” VOTE: ‘Yes” vote prohibits government recoveries for lawfully manufacturing, distributing, selling, advertising lawful products; immunizes persons conducting those activities against claims for product’s abuse, unlawful use.
RESULT OF “NO” VOTE: “No” vote rejects: prohibiting government recoveries for lawfully manufacturing, distributing, selling, advertising lawful products; immunizing persons conducting those activities when product is abused, unlawfully used.
SUMMARY: Amends Constitution. Under current law, persons manufacturing, distributing, selling, advertising products may be liable for compensatory damages and, when acting with malice or sufficient indifference, may be liable for punitive damages; damages may be reduced, barred by contributory negligence; sixty percent of all punitive damages go to state; settlement with tobacco manufacturers requires payments to state. Measure provides that no person, organization, or business enterprise lawfully manufacturing, distributing, promoting, or advertising lawful products shall be liable for damages resulting from *333 another’s abuse, unlawful use of those products. Measure prohibits state, local, taxing governments from claiming, or accepting in settlement, damages from persons, organizations, or business enterprises for lawfully manufacturing, distributing, selling, promoting, advertising any lawful product. Does not prevent prosecutions, injunctions otherwise available. Other provisions.

Ballot title certified. This decision shall become effective in accordance with ORAP 11.30(11).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rayner v. Stauffer Chemical Co.
585 P.2d 1240 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 P.3d 186, 333 Or. 330, 2002 Ore. LEXIS 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yugler-v-myers-or-2002.