Yuga Labs, Inc. v. Ripps

District Court, C.D. California·Decided October 11, 2022·No. 2:22-cv-04355·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. 2:22-CV-04355-JFW-JEM

PLL TSEW & KCIWNEF WAL TA SYENROTTA

Case 2:22-cv-04355-JFW-JEM Document 51 Filed 10/11/22 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1612 ERIC BALL (CSB No. 241327) Louis W. Tompros (pro hac vice) eball@fenwick.com louis.tompros@wilmerhale.com KIMBERLY CULP (CSB No. 238839) Monica Grewal (pro hac vice) kculp@fenwick.com monica.grewal@wilmerhale.com FENWICK & WEST LLP Scott W. Bertulli (pro hac vice) 801 California Street scott.bertulli@wilmerhale.com Mountain View, CA 94041 WILMER CUTLER PICKERING Telephone: 650.988.8500 HALE AND DORR LLP Fax: 650.938.5200 60 State Street Boston, MA 02109 ANTHONY M. FARES (CSB No. 318065) Telephone: (617) 526-6000 afares@fenwick.com Fax: (617) 526-5000 ETHAN M. THOMAS (CSB No. 338062) ethomas@fenwick.com Henry Nikogosyan (SBN 326277) FENWICK & WEST LLP henry.nikogosyan@wilmerhale.com 555 California Street, 12th Floor WILMER CUTLER PICKERING San Francisco, CA 94104 HALE AND DORR LLP Telephone: 415.875.2300 350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2400 Fax: 415.281.1350 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 443-5300 Attorneys for Yuga Labs, Inc. Fax: (213) 443-5400

Attorneys for Defendants Ryder Ripps and Jeremy Cahen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION Yuga Labs, Inc., Case No.: 2:22-cv-4355-JFW-JEM

Plaintiff, DISCOVERY MATTER

v. STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER Ryder Ripps, Jeremy Cahen, Does 1-10, District Judge: Honorable John F. Defendants. Walter

Magistrate Judge: Honorable John E. McDermott 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2 Case No. 2:22-CV-04355-JFW-JEM

Case 2:22-cv-04355-JFW-JEM Document 51 Filed 10/11/22 Page 2 of 23 Page ID #:1613 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 26(c) and to facilitate the production and receipt of information in discovery in this action, Plaintiff Yuga Labs, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Yuga Labs”) and Defendants Ryder Ripps and Jeremy Cahen (collectively, “Defendants”) have agreed and stipulated, through their respective counsel, to the entry of an order for the protection of trade secret, proprietary, and other confidential research, development, financial, business, or commercial information that may be produced or otherwise disclosed by them during the course of this action. Upon consideration of the record and proceedings herein, the parties hereby stipulate to the following terms: 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Stipulated Protective Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 14.3 below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Local Rule 79-5 and Section 9 of the Court’s Standing Order (Dkt. 14) set forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the Court to file material under seal. ///

/// 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 3 Case No. 2:22-CV-04355-JFW-JEM

Case 2:22-cv-04355-JFW-JEM Document 51 Filed 10/11/22 Page 3 of 23 Page ID #:1614 2. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT Counsel for the Parties to this Action have reviewed Edwards v. County of Los Angeles, 2009 WL 4707996 (C.D. Cal 2009) and have tailored this Stipulated Protective Order to comply with the Court’s guidance in that order. Specifically, the Parties have set forth below good cause for this Stipulated Protective Order, ensured that materials subject to the Stipulated Protective Order are “described in a meaningful fashion” in this section (see also infra Section 6.1), and ensured that the provisions regarding sealing comply with Local Rule 79-5.1 (see infra Section 14.3). This action is likely to involve trade secrets, pricing lists and other valuable research, development, commercial, financial, technical and/or proprietary information; sensitive personal information; and information protected by Nonparties’ right of privacy under California law. Special protection from public disclosure or disclosure to competitors, and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action, is warranted. Such confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other things, confidential business or financial information, information regarding confidential business practices, or other confidential research, development, or commercial information (including information implicating privacy rights of third parties), information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. The parties stipulate that disclosure of this information would cause competitive harm to the parties. For example, the parties believe that competitors will gain an unfair advantage if they learn the parties’ Protected Material, such as financial information, accounting information, customer lists, vendor lists, costs or profits structure, sales information, product lines, business and marketing strategy or information about operations. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 4 Case No. 2:22-CV-04355-JFW-JEM

Case 2:22-cv-04355-JFW-JEM Document 51 Filed 10/11/22 Page 4 of 23 Page ID #:1615 confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and to serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 3. DEFINITIONS 3.1. Action: This pending federal lawsuit, Yuga Labs, Inc. v. Ryder Ripps et al., Civil Action Case No. 2:22-cv-04355-JFW-JEM. 3.2. Challenging Party: A Party or Nonparty that challenges the designation of information or items under this Stipulated Protective Order. 3.3. “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: Information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 3.4. Counsel: Outside Counsel and In-House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 3.5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Yuga Labs, Inc. v. Ripps, (C.D. Cal. 2022).

Yuga Labs, Inc. v. Ripps (Yuga Labs, Inc. v. Ripps) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.