Yuen v. Wong
68 A.D.3d 475, 888 N.Y.2d 884
Opinion
In opposition to plaintiffs showing that defendants executed [476]*476the promissory note and defaulted in payment (see Alard, L.L.C. v Weiss, 1 AD3d 131 [2003]), defendants’ evidence was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact concerning any of the payments they claim should be credited against the note. Concur— Tom, J.P., Nardelli, Renwick, Freedman and Roman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Yuen v. Wong, 68 A.D.3d 475, 888 N.Y.2d 884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).
68 A.D.3d 475 (Yuen v. Wong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Alard v. Weiss
1 A.D.3d 131 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)