Yue Yun Li v. Gonzales
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Yue Yun Li, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir.2001), and deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility finding based on implausible testimony regarding material aspects of petitioner’s claim and a failure to provide easily available corroborating evidence. See id. at 1043-45.
[155]*155Because petitioner failed to demonstrate that he was eligible for asylum, it follows that he did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir .2003).
Because petitioner failed to raise a CAT claim in his opening brief, he waived this claim. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
203 F. App'x 154 (Yue Yun Li v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.