Yudaisis C. Delgado v. Raul Rodriguez
This text of Yudaisis C. Delgado v. Raul Rodriguez (Yudaisis C. Delgado v. Raul Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-12-00501-CV
YUDAISIS C. DELGADO APPELLANT
V.
RAUL RODRIGUEZ APPELLEE
------------
FROM THE 393RD DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
On September 24, 2013, we notified appellant that her brief had not been
filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R.
App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution
unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court
within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex.
R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.
DELIVERED: October 17, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Yudaisis C. Delgado v. Raul Rodriguez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yudaisis-c-delgado-v-raul-rodriguez-texapp-2013.