Yubin Zhang v. Holder

443 F. App'x 294
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 18, 2011
Docket07-74403
StatusUnpublished

This text of 443 F. App'x 294 (Yubin Zhang v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yubin Zhang v. Holder, 443 F. App'x 294 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Yubin Zhang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Bureau of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) orders denying his motion to file a late brief and summarily dismissing his appeal. The facts are known to the parties and need not be repeated here except to the extent necessary.

We have jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision to deny a motion to file an untimely appeal brief. See Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1012 & n. 2 (9th Cir.2010). The BIA’s order denying Zhang’s motion states: ‘We find the reason stated by [Zhang] insufficient for us to accept the untimely brief in our exercise of discretion.” The absence of a reasoned explanation for denying the motion prevents us from performing any meaningful appellate review. See Garcia Gomez v. Gonzales, 498 F.3d 1050, 1051 (9th Cir.2007) (per curiam). Therefore, we remand the matter to the BIA for further proceedings consistent with this disposition.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zetino v. Holder
622 F.3d 1007 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Garcia Gomez v. Gonzales
498 F.3d 1050 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
443 F. App'x 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yubin-zhang-v-holder-ca9-2011.