Yu v. Chen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Yu v. Chen

242 A.D.2d 352, 661 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8378

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 20, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 242 A.D.2d 352 (Yu v. Chen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yu v. Chen, 242 A.D.2d 352, 661 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8378 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In a [353]*353proceeding to invalidate a petition designating Ethel Chen as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 9, 1997, for the nomination of the Democratic Party as its candidate for the public office of Member of the City Council of the City of New York from the 20th Council District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), dated August 7, 1997, which granted the application.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The record reflects that the instant judgment was based upon a valid stipulation by the parties that Ethel Chen’s designating petition contained less than the required number of signatures for placement on the ballot. No appeal lies from such a judgment (see, Loughry v Lincoln First Bank, 66 NY2d 677; Kalra v Kalra, 170 AD2d 579; Matter of Colletti v Colletti, 56 AD2d 845).

In any event, there is no merit to the substantive arguments made by Chen. Mangano, P. J., Pizzuto, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a [353]*353proceeding to invalidate a petition designating Ethel Chen as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 9, 1997, for the nomination of the Democratic Party as its candidate for the public office of Member of the City Council of the City of New York from the 20th Council District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), dated August 7, 1997, which granted the application.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The record reflects that the instant judgment was based upon a valid stipulation by the parties that Ethel Chen’s designating petition contained less than the required number of signatures for placement on the ballot. No appeal lies from such a judgment (see, Loughry v Lincoln First Bank, 66 NY2d 677; Kalra v Kalra, 170 AD2d 579; Matter of Colletti v Colletti, 56 AD2d 845).

In any event, there is no merit to the substantive arguments made by Chen. Mangano, P. J., Pizzuto, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.D.2d 352, 661 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yu-v-chen-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack