Ysbeck v. City of Miami Beach

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ysbeck v. City of Miami Beach

505 So. 2d 21, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 946, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7577

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 7, 1987

DocketNo. 86-1586

StatusPublished

This text of 505 So. 2d 21 (Ysbeck v. City of Miami Beach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ysbeck v. City of Miami Beach, 505 So. 2d 21, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 946, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7577 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final summary judgment in favor of the City of Miami Beach. Yvon Ysbeck, the mother of a deceased minor, filed an action for negligence against the city based upon the drowning of eleven-year-old Ralph Ysbeck at the 41st Street beach. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the city on the stated basis that all the acts of negligence alleged by the Ysbecks were planning level decisions to which sovereign immunity attached. Subsequent to the trial court’s order, but prior to this appeal, our supreme court decided Avallone v. Board of Comm’rs of Citrus County, 493 So.2d 1002 (Fla.1986). This court has recently considered Avallone’s application on similar facts. See Bruce v. Village of Miami Shores, 496 So.2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (governmental entity assumes obligation to exercise reasonable care when it invites public to use its facility). Consistent with Bruce, we reverse the summary judgment in favor of the city and remand for further proceedings. Our reversal is without prejudice to the city to file a renewed motion for summary judgment on other grounds,

Reversed and remanded,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final summary judgment in favor of the City of Miami Beach. Yvon Ysbeck, the mother of a deceased minor, filed an action for negligence against the city based upon the drowning of eleven-year-old Ralph Ysbeck at the 41st Street beach. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the city on the stated basis that all the acts of negligence alleged by the Ysbecks were planning level decisions to which sovereign immunity attached. Subsequent to the trial court’s order, but prior to this appeal, our supreme court decided Avallone v. Board of Comm’rs of Citrus County, 493 So.2d 1002 (Fla.1986). This court has recently considered Avallone’s application on similar facts. See Bruce v. Village of Miami Shores, 496 So.2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (governmental entity assumes obligation to exercise reasonable care when it invites public to use its facility). Consistent with Bruce, we reverse the summary judgment in favor of the city and remand for further proceedings. Our reversal is without prejudice to the city to file a renewed motion for summary judgment on other grounds,

Reversed and remanded,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

505 So. 2d 21, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 946, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ysbeck-v-city-of-miami-beach-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack