Yowell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Yowell v. State

1917 OK CR 163, 165 P. 155, 13 Okla. Crim. 735, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 116

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 2, 1917

DocketNo. A-2354.

StatusPublished

This text of 1917 OK CR 163 (Yowell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Yowell v. State, 1917 OK CR 163, 165 P. 155, 13 Okla. Crim. 735, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 116 (Okla. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, James Yowell, was tried in the superior court of Oklahoma county on a charge of assault with intent to kill, and convicted of assault and battery, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $100 and costs.

*736 A careful examination of the record and briefs discloses the fact that the plaintiff in error had a fair and impartial trial, and escaped with exceedingly light punishment. No prejudicial error is found.

The judgment is affirmed. Mandate ordered forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, James Yowell, was tried in the superior court of Oklahoma county on a charge of assault with intent to kill, and convicted of assault and battery, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $100 and costs.

*736 A careful examination of the record and briefs discloses the fact that the plaintiff in error had a fair and impartial trial, and escaped with exceedingly light punishment. No prejudicial error is found.

The judgment is affirmed. Mandate ordered forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1917 OK CR 163, 165 P. 155, 13 Okla. Crim. 735, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yowell-v-state-oklacrimapp-1917.