Yovane v. White Plains Hospital Center

228 A.D.2d 436, 643 N.Y.2d 625, 643 N.Y.S.2d 625, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6262
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 3, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 228 A.D.2d 436 (Yovane v. White Plains Hospital Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Yovane v. White Plains Hospital Center, 228 A.D.2d 436, 643 N.Y.2d 625, 643 N.Y.S.2d 625, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6262 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

The decedent died on May 21, 1992. The plaintiff commenced this action against White Plains Hospital Center on November 8, 1993. The plaintiff later commenced a separate action against the defendant Dr. Gabrielle Bolton on August 19, 1994, which was ultimately consolidated with the action against the hospital.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the wrongful death [437]*437cause of action against Dr. Bolton is time-barred. This claim was not interposed within two years of the decedent’s death (see, EPTL 5-4.1), Dr. Bolton was not named as a defendant in the prior action against the hospital commenced by filing on November 8, 1993 (cf., CPLR 203 [c]), and she was not added as an additional defendant in that prior action by virtue of the granting of leave to amend (cf., CPLR 203 [f]). Even assuming that the "relation back” doctrine defined in Brock v Bua (83 AD2d 61), adopted in Mondello v New York Blood Ctr.—Greater N. Y. Blood Program (80 NY2d 219), and modified in Buran v Coupal (87 NY2d 173) may be applied at all under these circumstances (see, Town of Guilderland v Texaco Ref. & Mktg., 159 AD2d 829), such application is not warranted where, as here, there is no showing that, within the statutory two-year period, Dr. Bolton " 'must or should have known that, but for a mistake concerning [her] identity, the [first] action would have been brought against [her]’ ” (Virelli v Goodson-Todman Enters., 142 AD2d 479, 483, quoting Schiavone v Fortune, 477 US 21, 29; see also, Buran v Coupal, supra). Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Comice v. Justin's Restaurant
78 A.D.3d 641 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Shapiro v. Good Samaritan Regional Hospital Medical Center
42 A.D.3d 443 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Nani v. Gould
39 A.D.3d 508 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Sadeghinia v. Pierre
5 A.D.3d 658 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Brucha Mortgage Bankers Corp. v. Commissioner of Labor
266 A.D.2d 211 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Somer & Wand, P. C. v. Rotondi
251 A.D.2d 567 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Oquendo v. Rios
240 A.D.2d 552 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Piccinich v. Forest City Tech Place Associates
234 A.D.2d 528 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 A.D.2d 436, 643 N.Y.2d 625, 643 N.Y.S.2d 625, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/yovane-v-white-plains-hospital-center-nyappdiv-1996.