Youshah v. Youshah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Youshah v. Youshah

149 A.D.2d 416, 542 N.Y.S.2d 973, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4441

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 3, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 149 A.D.2d 416 (Youshah v. Youshah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Youshah v. Youshah, 149 A.D.2d 416, 542 N.Y.S.2d 973, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4441 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Diamond, J.), dated September 14, 1987, as granted the plaintiff wife, pendente lite, child support in the amount of $150 per week and maintenance in the amount of $50 per week.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We reject the husband’s contention that the temporary maintenance and support awards were excessive. Based upon [417]*417a review of the instant record, which consists of conflicting affidavits, we see no reason to substitute our discretion for that of the Supreme Court, which gave due consideration to all the relevant factors (see, Strauss v Strauss, 140 AD2d 330). Mangano, J. P., Kooper, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Diamond, J.), dated September 14, 1987, as granted the plaintiff wife, pendente lite, child support in the amount of $150 per week and maintenance in the amount of $50 per week.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We reject the husband’s contention that the temporary maintenance and support awards were excessive. Based upon [417]*417a review of the instant record, which consists of conflicting affidavits, we see no reason to substitute our discretion for that of the Supreme Court, which gave due consideration to all the relevant factors (see, Strauss v Strauss, 140 AD2d 330). Mangano, J. P., Kooper, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 A.D.2d 416, 542 N.Y.S.2d 973, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/youshah-v-youshah-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack