Youngs v. Bradley

New York Court of Appeals

Youngs v. Bradley

683 N.E.2d 774, 90 N.Y.2d 843, 660 N.Y.S.2d 868, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 2226

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 17, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 683 N.E.2d 774 (Youngs v. Bradley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Youngs v. Bradley, 683 N.E.2d 774, 90 N.Y.2d 843, 660 N.Y.S.2d 868, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 2226 (N.Y. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by respondent County of Broome to dismiss appellant’s appeal granted and appeal dismissed, with $400 costs and $100 costs of motion, upon the ground that as to that respondent no appeal lies as of right from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question (CPLR 5601). Motion by respondents Bradley and Maslar to dismiss appellant’s appeal granted and appeal dismissed, with $400 costs and $100 costs of motion, as against respondent Maslar upon the ground that no appeal lies as of right from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question (CPLR 5601), and as against respondent Bradley upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the consolidated action and proceeding as to him within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by respondent County of Broome to dismiss appellant’s appeal granted and appeal dismissed, with $400 costs and $100 costs of motion, upon the ground that as to that respondent no appeal lies as of right from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question (CPLR 5601). Motion by respondents Bradley and Maslar to dismiss appellant’s appeal granted and appeal dismissed, with $400 costs and $100 costs of motion, as against respondent Maslar upon the ground that no appeal lies as of right from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question (CPLR 5601), and as against respondent Bradley upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the consolidated action and proceeding as to him within the meaning of the Constitution.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

683 N.E.2d 774, 90 N.Y.2d 843, 660 N.Y.S.2d 868, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 2226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/youngs-v-bradley-ny-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack