Young's Appeal

3 Pennyp. 463
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
DecidedMarch 27, 1883
DocketNo. 241; No. 2
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Pennyp. 463 (Young's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Young's Appeal, 3 Pennyp. 463 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1883).

Opinion

— Per Curiam:

We think the evidence fails to disclose any joint cause of action in the appellants. The cause of complaint is shown to be separate and distinct in each. It is not sufficient that each has sustained the same kind of injury. This does not authorize them to file a joint bill. The principal object of this bill is to recover damages for an alleged fraud’ in making the contract. To recover these the appellants have a full, complete, and adequate remedy at law. The prayer for a rescission of the contract does not relieve the case from the fatal consequence of no joint cause of action in the appellants.

Decree affirmed, and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Pennyp. 463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/youngs-appeal-pactcomplphilad-1883.