Younger v. State
37 Ark. 116
Opinion
The indictment in this case is like that in State v. Keith, ante 96, and in Johnsons. State, 36 Ark. 242.
No motion in arrest of judgment was filed, but the indictment being bad in substance, no judgment should have been •rendered thereon against appellants.
Eevei-sed and remanded, with instructions to the Court below to arrest the judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Younger v. State, 37 Ark. 116 (Ark. 1881).
37 Ark. 116 (Younger v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McIntire v. State
236 S.W. 619 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1922)
Farr v. State
137 S.W. 563 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1911)
McCowan v. State
22 S.W. 955 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1893)