Youngblood v. Wilson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Youngblood v. Wilson

617 So. 2d 857, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4985, 1993 WL 144071

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 5, 1993

DocketNo. 91-03774

StatusPublished

This text of 617 So. 2d 857 (Youngblood v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Youngblood v. Wilson, 617 So. 2d 857, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4985, 1993 WL 144071 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this suit which includes an unjust enrichment count for money allegedly owed by defendant-appellee to plaintiff-appellant for value added by plaintiff to a house, plaintiff appeals a summary judgment for defendant. We reverse.

Summary judgment should not be granted when there is the slightest doubt as to whether a genuine issue of material fact exists. See Gomes v. Stevens, 548 So.2d 1163, 1164 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). In this case there was such doubt, including that raised by affidavits which conflicted as to whether defendant owned the house at the time value was allegedly added to it by plaintiff.

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

LEHAN, C.J., and RYDER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI